The study underscores that smaller, resource-limited communities are disproportionately affected by wildfires. These areas, often with high social vulnerability, lack the capacity to implement robust wildfire prevention and recovery measures. Towns such as Warm Springs, Oregon, and Goldendale, Washington, are highlighted as examples where social vulnerability amplifies the impact of wildfires, despite slightly lower exposure compared to better-resourced areas like Bend, Oregon. The findings suggest that public funding for wildfire mitigation may be more effective if directed toward low-income and vulnerable communities. Without adequate investment in prevention, these areas face heightened risks of property damage, displacement, and long-term recovery challenges.